|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each obstetric ultrasound examination performed is usually
accompanied by a sonographer’s report which conveys the measurements and
findings to the reporting physician.
Depending upon the format of the report it may also serve as a reminder
and guide for the sonographer that assists in the methodical performance of the
scan and ensures that all measurements are taken and all anatomical areas of
the fetus examined.
The ASUM and RACOG have a produced a recommended protocol
for the performance of the obstetric ultrasound examination in Australia, as
have the AIUM in conjunction with the ACR for the United States of
America. Based on these recommendations
a pro-forma was designed for all second and third-trimester pregnancy
ultrasound examinations in the Geelong Hospital Ultrasound Department to guide
the sonographers through a minimum standard examination. This, with the ASUM protocol, is reproduced
in the Appendix.
The range of anatomical areas covered by this pro-forma and
the techniques used by the sonographers to examine those areas provide a very
comprehensive survey of the fetus. Many
of the ultrasound markers for chromosomal abnormality are covered by this
standard survey. If, during the course
of a standard examination an abnormality is detected in the fetus, placenta,
cord, amniotic fluid volume or in regards to fetal growth, an even more
comprehensive fetal survey is undertaken.
An extra form is used in these situations: the chromosomal marker
pro-forma.
The search for fetal anatomical abnormalities can only be as
good as the sonographer’s knowledge of the range of abnormalities and their
ultrasound appearances. Many articles
stress the need for a search for other abnormalities when one is found, but only
rarely do they list what the search should entail. This may give the sonographer the impression that the views
included in a standard scan are enough to exclude those other abnormalities.
In order to augment the search for chromosomal markers, a
second pro-forma was developed for The Geelong Hospital which listed as many
potential ultrasound markers for aneuploidy as could be found. This was developed from the literature
review which was used for this thesis.
The current
(Westmead) pro-forma is reproduced in the Appendix. Although many of these markers are potentially visible on the
standard examination, in the extended examination emphasis is placed on the
quality of the examination, which must be unimpeachable. In particular, views of the heart must be of
the highest possible quality. If fetal
position obviates an excellent examination, the patient may be rescanned after
a period of time has elapsed for the fetus to move; usually 20-30 minutes is
sufficient. If maternal obesity or scar
tissue obviate an excellent examination, the patient may need to be rescanned
at later stage of pregnancy, although this is not always possible or even
successful in extreme obesity.
The extended list on this pro-forma may seem daunting at
first. However, most of these
abnormalities can be assessed as part of the routine scan in normal fetuses
within the time allowed on most institutions.
Very view extra images would actually be required. For example, the fronto-thalamic measurement is made on the BPD image, as are the
exclusion of agenesis of the corpus callosum, abnormal cephalic index and
strawberry shaped head. Extra views may
be required for ear and iliac wing measurement, and for confirmatory views of
the hands, feet and toes in coronal, transverse and sagittal planes. Most cardiac defects should be identified on
four-chamber and out-flow tract views, although judicious use of colour Doppler
may assist64.
The use of a sonographer’s pro-forma may assist in the
thorough assessment of the fetal morphology.
An extended checklist is used whenever an abnormality is detected. Such a protocol would assist in the
detection of extra malformations to affect the risk of chromosomal
abnormalities and therefore be a guide for genetic counselling.